Monday, December 31, 2012

IF DEATH IS YOUR DESTINY YOU CAN JUST WATCH THE SAME

Our creator god  enjoy  in ecstasy  the amusing  RECREATION of gang rapes and take delight in every bit of  existing excitement.

He will shortly send his fake messaih  to establish his resentment on the deceptiveness that is at the at hand. The messaih will be buckled and nude as the rapist be. The millions will eyewitness the rape of a soul with matter.

Denouncement, dishonour, exploitation, tattered will be his destiny…………that will be the upheaval of the reality in the approaching.

His creation of adams and eves will be cracked by his creation.  His eves  of polyyandry  and his adams  confront their fate.

Faraway not here in the south here dwells his territory. Greediness and spite hidden in the cavity. Contaminated and repulsive , his  man of archangel in white guard thy lord. The snakewoman  his progeny  dreadful and aged will be ordained to destiny.

 ( LAST NITES PROPHECY)

  WATCH ON YOUTUBE……………………OPEN YOUR EYES                 https://www.youtube.com/?tab=w1&authuser=0

Muslim Ethos in Indian Literature

Mohammad Hassan

The author is a Professor in Urdu at the Center of Indian Languages, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He has written 70 books and is an Urdu playwright and literary critic.Literature often mirrors the cultural ethos of a community represented in  particularly poetry.Indian Muslims :  Bengali without Nazrul Islam, or Punjabi without Waris Shah or Kashmiri without Habba Khatoon, or Awadhi without Jaisi or Brij Bhasha without Rahiman or Tamil without Abdur Rahman or Malayalam without K T Mohammad or, for that matter Indian literature without Ghalib ? the list is endless.From the beginning. Islam came to India in the 8th century Arabs who landed in Kerala as traders. But the new religion brought by Prophet Mohammad emphasized mono-theism with great vigor and, advocated and to a great extent, practiced equality among men of different race, colour and social strata. This message of equality attracted a large number of converts and it soon spread to other parts of the land.The second major contact developed in Sind-not as traders but as conquerors for here Mohammad Bin Qasim, an Arab lad of 14 years conquered a part of Sind in 712 AD as a reprisal to the looting of a ship of Arab pilgrims by Raja Dahir of Sind.To this day, Sindhi is written in a modified Arabic script and bears a strong component of Arab and Islamic influence in the tone and tenor of its poetry. And it was here that Abdul Latif Bhitai composed his songs of mystic devotion and human love. A new era had already began- the era of cosmopolitan mystic vision.

Undoubtedly mysticism is monopoly of Islam groups of Muslim mystics swarmed over parts of North India .

 

 Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti who came from Iraq in the 12th century in Ajmer held in high esteem both by Hindus and Muslims and the compositions of one of his disciples, Baba Farid, form -part of the holy book of the Sikhs , the Guru Granth Sahib.  Both of them emphasized the concept of the equality of man and sang of man?s total submergence in the divine existence of God Almighty. The idea caught on and spread with speed and alacrity to practically all the dialects and languages of the land, and assumed different shapes and forms. One of these was that of allegory and symbolism. Human existence was symbolized as a woman in love who has been unwittingly separated from her beloved – or human existence  was portrayed as a woman in love while God was taken to be the separated husband. This also took the form of Bara-masa, (Twelve months) in which the damsel describes the charms of every season, month by month, and implores her beloved to take pity on her and to join her in enjoying the seasonal blessings.

This marks the great beginning in practically all-modern Indian languages.

The mystic era had begun.

The famous Indian historian Dr. Tara Chand has traced the origin and development of the Bhakti movement in the south

spreading in the north

And Muslim poets and saints played a very significant part therein.

In Hindi, for instance four recognized categories of Bhakti poetry

Gyana-Kshri, Prem Margi Sufi, Ram Bhakti and Krishna Bhakti .

 

Emergence of Amir Khusrau,  disciple of the Sufi saint Hazrat Nizamuddin Auslia of Delhi, and his bridal songs, riddles and stray couplets mark the beginning of poetry in a mixed language with an amalgam of Khari Boli grammatical syntax and a sprinkling of Turkish, Persian and Arabic words

Later on Kabir (whom several scholars consider Muslim) and his followers in the Gyana-Kshri and Nirgun Bhakti worshipping idols and believing in the non-material existence of God.  And the followers of Jaisi?s philosophy and diction were many, who adorn the ranks of Prem Margi Sufi poets, including Mulla Daud, Qutban and Manjhan.

Then came the Krishna Bhaktas and these also include a number of Muslim poets. Sri Krishna has often been symbolized as the romantic embodiment of divine existence . Poets like Maulana Hasrat Mohani took pride in proclaiming himself a Krishna Bhakt, Hence the continuing tradition from Ras Khan (the famous Brij Bhasha poet) to Hasrat Mohani.

Of course, Riti Kal of Brij Bhasha Hindi poetry abounds in Muslim names and extends its frontiers to Gujarat and Deccan (mainly parts of Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Maharashtra), in the form of Gujri and Deccani.  later on under the Bijapur, Golconda and Ahmadnagar Kingdoms, a whole corpus of literary writings developed with Muslim authorship.

In Bijapur and Golconda kings, saints, courtiers and itinerant scholars and poets, all made their contribution in making an indigenous language rich.

The development of Urdu language and literature in the north of literary history.

Urdu literature in the north flourished mainly in the 18th and 19th centuries in Delhi , Uttar Pradesh and Bihar where masnavi writers like Afzal, Mir, Mir Asar and Mir Hasan continued to enrich and extend the tradition of allegorical and non-allegorical romantic poetic tales and started writing ghazals in Urdu, thus combining earthly romance with deeper metaphysical thought pattern.

The stalwarts included

  1. MIR TAQI MIR AND MIRZA ASADULLAH KHAN GHALIB IN DELHI WHOSE CATHOLICISM AND FREE-THINKING EARNED FOR THEM AN ETERNAL PLACE IN THE HEARTS OF MILLIONS;
  2. AGHA HASAN AMANAT?S INDER SABHA IN 1846 ATTEMPTED AN AMALGAM OF HINDU MYTHOLOGY WITH AWADH CULTURE AND USHERED IN A NEW ERA IN INDIAN DRAMA;
  3. MIR ANIS RELIGIOUS EPICS ON THE BATTLE OF KARBALA GAVE ITS ARAB CHARACTERS LOCAL HABITATION AND AN INDIAN LOOK THE INIMITABLE NAZEER AKBARABADI OF AGRA
  4. URDU LITERATURE BY ITSELF STANDS WITNESS TO THE INVOLVEMENT WITH THE INDIAN ETHOS.
  5. URDU LITERATURE PARTICULARLY THE GHAZAL, GAVE TYRICAL EXPRESSION TO THE AGONY AND ECSTASY OF THE NATIONAL SCENE THROUGHOUT THE AGES.
  6. POETS LIKE MIR, GHALIB, IQBALA AND JOSH MALIHABADI;

fiction writers and movelists

like Nazeer Ahmed, Mirza Mohammad Hadi Ruswa, Abdul Haleem Sharar, Sajjad Yaldram, and in our own times, Qurratulain Hyder, Ismat Chughtai, Jilani Bano, Hayatullah Ansari and Khwaja Ahmed Abbas; prose writers like Abul Kalam Azad, Qazi Abdul Ghaffar and Rashid Ahmed Siddiqi; and dramatists like Agha Hasan Amanat, Agha Hashr, Imtiaz Ali Taj and Mohammad Mujib.

The whole galaxy of progressive writers

Faiz, Majaz, Makhdoom Mohiuddin , Parvez Shahidi, Ali Sardar Jafri, Jan Nisar Akhtar, Sahir Ludhianvi, Kaifi Azmi and Majrooh Sultuanpuri. Iqbal by his philosophy of Self aroused the Asian nations ,Josh Malihabadi?s revolutionary poetry and Abul Kalam Azad?s fiery writings .

In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, Rasikh, Shad, Hasrat Mohani, Jigar, Josh and innumerable others.

Muslim writers and composers have made their mark in Kajri, Laoni and other popular folk forms. Recently, Azhar Husain Faruqi?sUttar Pradesh ke lok geet gives a long list of Muslim ?composers? and these represent only a portion of such contribution.

But the contribution of Indian Muslimswas by no means restricted only to Urdu literature.

In Punjab literature, for instance, mystics and saints left their own indelible marks. Waris Shah and Bulhe Shah composed classics in the 18th century, which are yet to be surpassed in excellence and acceptability.

Even when the subcontinent was divided into two hostile countries, India and Pakistan and the border state of Punjab, the land of five rivers, was itself partitioned, the gathering of Punjab soldiers on both sides of the frontier could be seen listening to or reciting Waris Shah?s epic Heer Ranjha jointly in the dead of night.

Further North, Kashmiri literature also boasts of its Indian Muslimauthors, the greatest of them being, perhaps, Habba Khatoon, a plain peasant girl wedded to a ruling monarch and sharing his destiny in glory and Suffering. Then comes Mahjur, who sang songs of liberty and social justice and enthused Kashmiris to wrest their rights with courage and determination. Of course, these two names are only representative of dozens of other such writers and poets.

Further east, the development of Bengali literature, Second World War and revolutionary song began

 

. Nazrul stands next to Tagore in his appeal and artistic excellence and his poetry inspired millions of Bengali-speaking people of India and Bangladesh in their struggle for independence.

In fact, Nazrul inspired poets of all the modern Indian languages and provided a model for Josh Mahilabadi in Urdu, Subhramaniam Bharati in Tamil, Vallathal in Malayalam and Dinkar in Hindi.

 

Bengali literature can boast of other Muslim writers and ?composers

Kazi Abdul Wudood, Communist writer and intellectual Muzaffar Ahmad and compose and sing Baul poetry.

Further down, we come across Oriya in which Mughal tamasha,a distinct form of folk drama, owes its origin mainly to Muslim writers. In Tamil, Abdur Rahman a major poet.

In the sister languages of Kannada and Telugu, the Golconda king, Quli Qutub Shah was also credited to be a Telugu poet.

In Marathi, and Gujarati too, Muslim writers made their mark while in Malayalam, the stories and novels of K T Mohammad gained distinction.

THIS IS ONLY A CURSORY OUTLINE OF THE MUSLIM CONTRIBUTION TO THE VARIOUS AND MODERN INDIAN LANGUAGES AND LITERATURES. BUT MERELY LISTING NAMES OF MUSLIM POETS AND WRITERS, DOES NOT DO JUSTICE TO THEIR ROLE NOR DOES IT EVALUATE THE TRUE NATURE, EXTEND AND DEPTH OF THEIR IMPACT.

This impact was not restricted only to Muslim writers but percolated to all levels and all kinds of writers irrespective of their religious fidelities.

What does this impact really mean in terms of the literary structure of these languages?

Firstly, it must be appreciated that the word Muslim denotes a much wider cultural domain than Islam. Islam was a set of beliefs but Muslims of different countries, though adhering to these common beliefs, developed their own cultural identities in conjunction with their indigenous environments.

Islam for instance, forbids, or at least discourages all arts, frowns on the practice of music, dance and sculpture and deprecates painting, yet in all these fields Indian Muslims, and devout Muslims at that, earned distinction.

It has often been the case that the artistic talent of Muslims in the forbidden arts found expression either in permitted media (for example, the expression of painting talent in calligraphy or of sculpture in the carving of Quranic verses on the Qutub Minar) or in the innovative transfer of these talents to other media. Hence the Muslim contribution to literature and poetry should be taken in this context, which in some measure, explains the popularity enjoyed by poetry among Muslims in general so that couplets form part of ordinary everyday conversation.

The second important factorthat should be noted is that this contribution was basically secular and cosmopolitan in character.

Secular ?because Muslim poets and men of letters could not identify themselves with Hindu religious or devotional poetry (barring instances where it had been raised to mystical or allegorical heights) and hence their writings, both in poetry and prose, opened the gates of secular and materialist subjects. What sustained this new poetic idiom was its cosmopolitanism.

To bracket this cosmopolitanism with alien influences would be erroneous.

The fact remains that the Turco-Iranian cultural tradition was, in the Dark Ages, the predominant world tradition. Europe was still to emerge as the new arbiter of human destiny and Arabs were dispensing the knowledge acquired from Greek sources, through translations. The Turco-Iranian tradition had absorbed this corpus of knowledge and had become its champion in Asia and the Middle East. Hence, the adoption, or acceptance of these Turco-Iranian influences meant imbibing the impact of the then pervading world culture.

Thirdly,it should also be borne in mind that Muslim contact was not primarily through administrators or rulers but mainly through traders (who purchased handicrafts and other manufactured goods and materials from the Indian towns or trade centres and sold them in Central Asian and West Asian courts and markets), Sufi saints, scholars and mercenary soldiers.

Consequently, the adoption of these influences was the acceptance of world cultural norms and values of that period.The literary exchanges between Turco-Iranian traditions and modern Indian languages were therefore a part of this transaction, which can be compared to the impact of the English language and literature on various Indian languages today.

The Indian Muslim writer?s contribution to various modern Indian languages and literatures, therefore, is two-fold: first in creating a secular and cosmopolitan literary idiom, and second in forging a new syntactical conciseness and close-knit poetic and literary expression mainly brought about as part of this Turco-Iranian impact.

Though very close to Sanskrit, old Persian

had taken a different syntactical line of development. To discuss in detail the nature of the syntactical influences of the Turco-Persian traditions on the modern Indian languages is beyond the scope of this essay but the use of izafat (conjunctional lower apostrophe) alone gave much greater compactness and conciseness to expression.

The same holds good in the case of symbols-and non-religious and non-mythical symbols at that. Even Nazrul Islam, who is greatly influenced by Hindu mythological symbols, introduced several new dimensions to them and introduced a series of symbols from the Turco-Iranian tradition. Hence, the ghazal as poetic form remains popular in Hindi, Marathi, Gujarati, Punjabi, Bengali and several other languages. Not exclusively a contribution of Muslims alone, it has however a Muslim connexion. mushairas are held in almost every important town and attract large crowds. ghazal concerts are a craze and immediate commercial success.

While Muslim writers are among the prominent literary authors of various Indian languages, a sense of alienation separates them from their fellow writers.

Recurrent communal Hindu-Muslim riots breed extremists on both ends and create distrust and insecurity. Hence the psyche of the Indian Muslim writer, whether writing in Urdu or Malayalam or Marathi, experiences an ordeal different from his compatriots.

  • ADD TO THIS, THE RISE OF FUNDAMENTALISM,
  • RULE OF PAKISTANI MILITARY DICTATORS
  • REIGN OF ORTHODOX PAPACY OF IMAM KHOMEINI OF IRAN
  • WHICH HAVE BEEN POSING SERIOUS THREATS TO LIBERALISM AND RATIONALISM TO MUSLIMS EVERYWHERE IN THE WORLD ? AND WE GET A COMPLETE, OR A NEAR COMPLETE, PICTURE OF THE CONTEXT AN AVERAGE INDIAN MUSLIM WRITER FINDS HIMSELF IN.
  • This crusade cannot be waged and won in isolation but with wider, much wider, cooperation and support of the people. And it is for this that writers, and among them Muslim writers too, though it fit to break the conventional framework of communication media and reach the common man through street theatre.
  • Habib Tanvir attempted to express through him the woes and sufferings of a suffocated society.
  • Safdar Hashmi took street theatre to the masses and addressed them on burning topics directly connected with their own lives.

Yet there is a silver lining to this dismal panorama. A number of Indian Muslim writers of the composite culture evolved through centuries of communion as a part of the defence of democratic values in our land.

 

 

Criticizing the Establishment he paid the price with his own life, and symbolized the struggle of making India a safer and a better place to live and in preserving the highest values of a composite culture evolved during centuries of our history.

 

Understanding the History of Islam

 

He was Noah Ibn Lamik, Ibn Mitoshilkh, Ibn Enoch, Ibn yard, Ibn Mahlabeel, Ibn Qinan, Ibn Anoush, Ibn Seth, Ibn Adam the Father of Mankind (PBUH).

According to the history of the People of the Book, (refers to the Jews, and Christians, so called by Allah because they received Revealed Books, Taurat, Zabur and Injeel. These names are translated 'Torah, Psalms, and Gospels' respectively, but the books that are extent are corrupt. Of the Revealed Books, ONLY the Quran remains exactly as it was revealed).

the period between the birth of Noah and the death of Adam was 146 years. (According to Genesis 5 (new Revised Standard Version), Noah was born one hundred and twenty six years after the death of Adam. Ibn Abbas narrated that the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) said: "The period between Adam and Noah was ten centuries." (Sahih Bukhari, Noah was born 1056 years after Adam's creation (or after he left the Garden of Eden). Thus, this hadith does not contradict the previous statement from the People of the Book as it may first appear to do. The reader should keep in mind, however that any statement or narratives taken from the People of the Book are not necessarily credible. This was taken from Genesis 5).

For many generations Noah's people had been worshipping statues that they called gods. They believed that these gods would bring them good, protect them from evil and provide all their needs. They gave their idols names such as Waddan, Suwa'an, Yaghutha, Ya'auga, and Nasran, (These idols represented, respectively, manly power; mutability, beauty; brute strength, swiftness, sharp sight, insight) according to the power they thought these gods possessed.

Allah the Almighty revealed: "They (idolaters) have said: "You shall not leave your gods nor shall you leave Wadd, nor Suwa, nor Yaghuth, nor Ya uq nor Nasr (names of the idols)." (CH 71:23 Quran).

Originally these were the names of good people who had lived among them. After their deaths, statues of them were erected to keep their memories alive. After sometime, however, people began to worship these statues. Later generations did not even know why they had been erected; they only knew their parents had prayed to them. That is how idol worshipping developed. Since they had no understanding of Allah the Almighty Who would punish them for their evil deeds, they became cruel and immoral.

The Quran does not give details of Isaac's life (pbuh), but reliable Quranic commentators mentioned that when Abraham felt that his life was drawing to a close, he wished to see Isaac married. He did not want Isaac to marry one of the Canaanites, who were pagans, so he sent a trustworthy servant to Haran in Iraq to choose a bride for Isaac. The servant's choice fell upon Rebekah Bint Bethuel, Ibn Nahor, who was a brother of Abraham. Isaac married her and she gave birth to a set of twins, Esau (Al Eis) and Jacob (Yaqub).

Ill feelings developed between the two brothers when they grew into manhood. Esau disliked the fact that Jacob was favored by his father and by Allah with prophethood. This ill feeling became so serious that Esau threatened to kill his brother. Fearing for his life, Jacob fled the country.

The People of the Book said that when Isaac was forty years old, he married Rebekah, Bint Bethuel, during his father's life. They said she was sterile, so Isaac prayed to Allah and then she became pregnant. She gave birth to twin boys. The first one was called Esau whom the Arabs called Al-Eis. He became the father of Rum. The second one was called Jacob, which means Isreal, (belonging to the people of Israel).

The People of the Book said Esau threatened to kill his brother when their father was dead. They also said that he asked his father to pray for him that Allah make the earth good for his offsprin and multiply his sustenance and fruits.

When their mother knew that Esau threatened his brother Jacob, she commanded her son Jacob to go to her brother Laban in the land of Haran and abide with him for a time until his brother's anger had abated, and to marry one of the Laban's daughters. she told her husband Isaac to command him with that advice and pray for him, and he did.

Jacob (pbuh) left his family, when night came he found a place to rest. He took a stone and put it under his head and slept. He dreamed of a ladder from heaven to earth. Angels were ascending and descending and the Lord addressed him and said to him; "I will bless you and your offspring and make this land for you and for those who come after you."

WHen he awoke he felt joyful from what he had seen in his dream and vowed, for Allah's sake that if he returned to his family safely, he would build here a temple for Allah the Almighty. He also vowed to give one tenth of his property for the sake of Allah. He poured oil on the stone so as to recognize it and called the place "Ayle's House" (Bethel), which means "House of Allah". It was to be the location of Jerusalem later.

After a period of time, his uncle prepared a feast and gathered people for the wedding. He married Leah, his elder daughter, to him at night. She was weak-sighted and ugly. When morning came, Jacob discovered she was Leah and he complained to his uncle. "You deceived me; I was engaged to Rachel and you married me to Leah." His uncle said: "It is not our tradition to marry the younger daughter before the elder daughter. However, if you love her sister, work another seven years and I will marry you to both of them."

Jacob worked for seven years and then married Rachel. It was acceptable in their time, as described in the Torah, for a man to marry two sisters. Laban gave a female slave to each daughter. Leah's slave was called Zilpah and Rachel's slave was called Bilha.

Almighty Allah compensated Leah's weakness by giving her sons. the first one was named Rueben (Robel), after whom there were Simon (Shamun), Levi (Lawi), and Judah (Yahudh).

Then Rachel prayed to Allah to give her a son from Jacob. Allah heard her call and responded to her prayer. She gave birth to a son, great, honorable, and beautiful. She named him Joseph (Yusuf).

All of this happened when they were in the land of Haran and Jacob (pbuh) was pasturing his uncle's sheep, which he did for a period of twenty years.

Jacob then asked his uncle Laban to let him go and visit his family.

The People of the Book said that Jacob (pbuh) took fresh rods of poplar, almond, and plane.

When Jacob approached the land of Seir, the angels greeted him. He sent a messenger ahead with greetings to his brother Esau, asking forgiveness and humbling himself before him.

When he came to Succoth (Sahur), he built a house for himself and shades for his beasts. Then he passed by Jerusalem, the village of Shechem, and camped before the village. He bought a farm from Shcehm Ibn Hamor with one hundred goats and built an altar, which he called Ayl, as Allah commanded him. He built the altar where Jerusalem stands today and later Solomon son of David (pbuh) rebuilt it. It is in the place of the stone which he had earlier anointed with oil as was mentioned before.

Jacob came to his father Isaac and settled with him in the village of Hebron which lies in the land of Canaan where Abraham had lived. Then Isaac fell ill and died when he was one hundred eighty years old. his sons Esau and Jacob buried him with his father Abraham Al Khalil in a cave which he had bought. It was said that Abraham died at the age of one hundred seventy five.

They say: "Be Jews or Christians, and then you will be guided." Say (to them O Muhammad): "Nay (we follow) only the religion of Abraham, Hanifan (Islamic monotheism, i.e. to worship none but Allah Alone, and he was not of the Al Mushrikeen (those who worshipped others along with Allah)."

Say (O Muslims): "We believe in Allah and that which has been sent down to us and that which had been sent down to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob and to Al Asbat (the twelve sons of Jacob), and that which has been given to Moses and Jesus and that which has been given to the Prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and to Him we have submitted (in Islam)."

So if they believe in the like of that which you believe, then they are rightly guided, but if they turn away, then they are only in opposition. So, Allah, will suffice you against them. He is the All Hearer, the All Knower.

In another surah Almighty Allah declared: O People of the Scripture (Jews and Christians)! Why do you dispute about Abraham, while the Torah and the Gospel were not revealed till after him? Have you then no sense? Verily, you are those who have disputed about that of which you have no knowledge. Why do then dispute concerning that which you have no knowledge? It is Allah Who knows, and you know not.

Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian, but he was a true Muslim Hanifan (Islamic Monotheism), to worship none but Allah Alone and he was not of the polytheists (he joined none in worship with Allah).

Verily, Abraham was an Ummah (a leader having all the good righteous qualities or a nation), obedient to Allah, Hanifan (to worship none but Allah), and he was not one of those who were Al Mushrikeen (polytheists, idolaters, disbeliveers in the Oneness of Allah and those who joined partners with Allah). He was thankful for His (Allah's) Graces. He (Allah) chose him (as an intimate friend) and guided him to a Straight Path (Islamic Monotheism, neither Judaism or Christianity). We gave him good in this world and in the Hereafter he shall be of the righteous. Then, We have inspired you (O Muhammad saying): "Follow the religion of Abraham Hanifan (Islamic Monotheism to worship none but Allah) and he was not of the Mushrikeen (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbeliveers in the Oneness of Allah and His Messenger Muhammad, those who worship others along with Allah or set up rivals with or partners to Allah)." (Ch 16:119-123 Quran)

 

 WORLD AND CULTURE 

In China and India, in Babylonia and Egypt, in Greece and Rome, "divine" beings selected from among the daughters of men the purest and most beautiful to serve them as a means of entrance into the world of mortals. Wishing to take upon themselves the human form, while retaining at the same time their "divinity," this compromise — of an earthly mother with a "divine" father — was effected. In the form of a swan Jupiter approached Leda, as in the guise of a dove, or a Paracletug, Jehovah "overshadowed" Mary.

  1. A nymph bathing in a river in China is touched by a lotus plant, and the divine Fohi is born.
  2. In Siam, a wandering sunbeam caresses a girl in her teens, and the great and wonderful deliverer, Codom, is born.
  3.  In the life of Buddha we read that he descended on his mother Maya, "in likeness as the heavenly queen, and entered her womb," and was born from her right side, to save the world."
  4. In Greece, the young god Apollo visits a fair maid of Athens, and a Plato is ushered into the world.
  5. In ancient Mexico, as well as in Babylonia, and in modern Corea, as in modern Palestine, as in the legends of all lands, virgins gave birth and became divine mothers.
  6. But the real home of virgin births is the land of the Nile. Eighteen hundred years before Christ, we find carved on one of the walls of the great temple of Luxor a picture of the annunciation, conception and birth of King Amunothph III, an almost exact copy of the annunciation, conception and birth of the Christian God.

Of course no one will think of maintaining that the Egyptians borrowed the idea from the Catholics nearly two thousand years before the Christian era. "The story in the Gospel of Luke, the first and second chapters is," says Malvert, "a reproduction, 'point by point,' of the story in stone of the miraculous birth of Amunothph." [Science and Religion. p. 96.]

Sharpe in his Egyptian Mythology, the divine Wolrd or Loges, in the act of hailing the virgin queen, announcing to her that she is to give birth to a son. the god Kneph (assisted by Hathor) gives life to her. This is the Holy Ghost, or Spirit that causes conception. …

Luxor temple, then, is one of the sources to which the anonymous writers of the Gospels went for their miraculous story. It is no wonder they suppressed their own identity as well as the source from which they borrowed their material.

Not only the idea of a virgin mother, but all the other miraculous events, such as the stable cradle, the guiding star, the massacre of the children, the flight to Egypt, and the resurrection and bodily ascension toward the clouds, have not only been borrowed, but are even scarcely altered in the New Testament story of Jesus.

Gerald Massey in his great work on Egyptian origins demonstrates the identity of Mary, the mother of Jesus, with Isis, the mother of Horus. He says: "The most ancient, goldbedizened, smoke-stained Byzantine pictures of the virgin and child represent the mythical mother as Isis, and not as a human mother of Nazareth. [Vol. II, p. 487.]

  1. The resurrection, the ascension, the eucharist, baptism, worship by kneeling or prostration, the folding of the hands, the ringing of bells and the burning of incense, the vestments and vessels used in church, the candles, "holy" water, — even the word Mass, were all from the religions of the ancients.
  2. The Trinity is as much Pagan, as much Indian or Buddhist, as it is Christian. The idea of a Son of God is as old as 'the oldest cult.
  3. The sun is the son of heaven in all primitive faiths. The physical sun becomes in the course of evolution, the Son of Righteousness, or the Son of God, and heaven is personified as the Father on High.
  4.  The halo around the head of Jesus, the horns of the older deities, the rays of light radiating from the heads of Hindu and Pagan gods are incontrovertible evidence that all gods were at one time — the sun in heaven.

 

The story of Jesus, — his birth and betrayal by one of his own disciples, his trial in a Roman court, his crucifixion, resurrection and ascension, — belongs to the order of imaginative literature. Conceived at first as a religious drama, it received many new accretions as it traveled from country to country and from age to age. The "piece" shows signs of having been touched and retouched to make it acceptable to the different countries in which it was played. The hand of the adapter, the interpolator and the reviser is unmistakably present. As an allegory, or as a dramatic composition, meant for the religious stage, it proved one of the strongest productions of Pagan or Christian times. But as real history, it lacks the fundamental requisite — probability. As a play, it is stirring and strong; as history, it lacks naturalness and consistency. The miraculous is ever outside the province of history. Jesus was a miracle, and as such, at least, we are safe in declaring him unhistorical.

Paganism was the religion of the most advanced and cultured nations of antiquity. How could an imaginary Zeus, or Jupiter, draw to his temple the elite of Greece and Rome? And if there is nothing strange in the rise and spread of the Pagan church; in the rapid progress of the worship of Osiris, who never existed; in the wonderful success of the religion of Mithra, who is but a name; if the worship of Adonis, of Attis, of Isis, and the legends of Heracles, Prometheus, Hercules, and the Hindu trinity, — Brahma, Shiva, Chrishna, — with their rock-hewn temples, can be explained without believing in the actual existence of these gods — why not Christianity? Religions, like everything else, are born, they grow and die. They show the handiwork of whole races, and of different epochs, rather than of one man or of age. Time gives them birth, and changing environments determine their career. Just as the portrait of Jesus we see in shops and churches is an invention, so is his character. The artist gave him his features, the theologian his attributes.

What are the elements out of which the Jesus story was evolved? The Jewish people were in constant expectation of a Messiah. The belief prevailed that his name would be Joshua, which in English is Jesus. The meaning of the word is savior. In ancient Syrian mythology, Joshua was a Sun God. The Old-Testament Joshua, who "stopped the Sun," was in all probability this same Syria, divinity. According to tradition this Joshua, or Jesus, was the Son of Mary, a name which with slight variations is found in nearly all the old mythologies. Greek and Hindu divinities were mothered by either a Mary, Meriam, Myrrah, or Merri, Maria or Mares is the oldest word for sea — the earliest source of life. The ancients looked upon the sea-water as the mother of every living thing. "Joshua (or Jesus), son of Mary," was already a part of the religious outfit of the Asiatic world when Paul began his missionary tours. His Jesus, or anointed one, crucified or slain, did in no sense represent a new or original message. It is no more strange that Paul's mythological "savior" should loom into prominence and cast a spell over all the world, than that a mythical Apollo or Jupiter should rule for thousands of years over the fairest portions of the earth.

It is also well known that there is in the Talmud the story of a Jesus, Ben, or son, of Pandira, who lived about a hundred years before the Gospel Jesus, and who was hanged from a tree. I believe this Jesus is quite as legendary as the Syrian Hesous, or Joshua. But may it not be that such a legend accepted as true — to the ancients all legends were true — contributed its share toward marking the outlines of the later Jesus, hanged on a cross? My idea has been to show that the materials for a Jesus myth were at hand, and that, therefore, to account for the rise and progress of the Christian cult is no more difficult than to explain the widely spread religion of the Indian Chrishna, or of the Persian Mithra. [For a fuller discussion of the various "christs" in mythology read Robertson's Christianity and Mythology and his Pagan Christs.]

Now, why have I given these conclusions to the world? Would I not have made more friends — provoked a warmer response from the public at large — had I repeated in pleasant accents the familiar phrases about the glory and beauty and sweetness of the Savior God, the Virgin-born Christ? Instead of that, I have run the risk of alienating the sympathies of my fellows by intimating that this Jesus whom Christendom worships today as a god, this Jesus at whose altar the Christian world bends its knees and bows its head, is as much of an idol as was Apollo of the Greeks; and that we — we Americans of the twentieth century — are an idolatrous people, inasmuch as we worship a name, or at most, a man of whom we know nothing provable.

The story of Eden possesses all the marks of an allegory. Adam and Eve, and a perfect world suddenly plunged from a snowy whiteness into the blackness of hell, In the fall of Adam, we are told, humanity itself fell. Could anything be more fanciful than that? And what was Adam's sin? He coveted knowledge. He wished to improve his mind. He experimented with forbidden things. He dared to take the initiative. And for that imaginary crime, even the generations not yet born are to be forever blighted. Even the animals, the flowers and vegetables were cursed for it. Can you conceive of anything more mythical than that? one of the English divines of the age of Calvin declared that original sin, — Adam's sin imputed to us, — was so awful, that "if a man had never been born he would yet have been damned for it." It is from this mythical sin that a mythical Savior saves us. And how does he do it? In a very mythical way, as we shall see.

When the world fell, it fell into the devil's hands. To redeem a part of it, at least, the deity concludes to give up his only son for a ransom. This is interesting. God is represented as being greatly offended, because the world which he had created perfect was all in a heap before him. To placate himself he sacrificed his son — not himself.

But, as intimated above, he does not intend to restore the whole world to its pristine purity, but only a part of it. This is alarming. He creates the whole world perfect, but now he is satisfied to have only a portion of it redeemed from the devil. If he can save at all, pray, why not save all? This is not an irrelevant question when it is remembered that the whole world was created perfect in the first place.

The refusal of the deity to save all of his world from the devil would lead one to believe that even when God created the world perfect he did not mean to keep all of it to himself, but meant that some of it, the greater part of it, as some theologians contend, should go to the devil! Surely this is nothing but myth. Let us hope for the sake of our ideals that all this is no more than the childish prattle of primitive man.

How is it that when you read the literature of the Greeks, the literature of the Persians, the literature of Hindostan, or of the Mohammedan world, you discriminate between fact and fiction, between history and myth, but when it comes to the literature of the Jews, you stammer, you stutter, you bite your lips, you turn pale, and fall upon your face before it as the savage before his fetish? You would consider it unreasonable to believe that everything a Greek, or a Roman, or an Arab ever said was inspired. And yet, men have been hounded to death for not believing everything that a Jew ever said in olden times was inspired.

I do not have to use arguments, I hope, to prove to an intelligent public that an infallible book is as much a myth as the Garden of Eden, or the Star of Bethlehem. A mythical Savior, a mythical Bible, a mythical plan of salvation!

Christianity, Mohammedanism and Judaism, the three kindred religions— we call them kindred because they are related in blood and are the offspring of the same soil and climate — these three kindred religions must be interpreted not by what they profess today, but by what they did when they had both the power and the opportunity to do as they wished.

When Christianity, or Mohammedanism, was professed only by a small handful of men — twelve fishermen, or a dozen camel- drivers of the desert — neither party advocated persecution. The worst punishment which either religion held out was a distant and a future punishment; but as soon as Christianity converted an Emperor, or Mohammed became the victorious warrior, that is to say, as soon as, springing forth, they picked up the sword and felt their grip sure upon its hilt, this future and distant punishment materialized into a present and persistent persecution of their opponents. Is not that suggestive? Then, again, when in the course of human evolution, both Christianity and Mohammedanism lost the secular support — the throne, the favor of the courts, the imperial treasury — they fell back once more upon future penalties as the sole menace against an unbelieving world. As religion grows, secularly speaking, weaker and is more completely divorced from the temporal, even the future penalties, from being both literal and frightful, pale into harmless figures of speech.

King Asoka, for instance, the Buddhist sovereign of India, 250 years before Jesus, in one of his edicts chiseled on the rocks of India, declared against human slavery and offered the sweet gift of liberty to all in captivity. Jesus used the word slave in one of his parables (improperly translated servant), without expressing himself on the subject, except to intimate that when a slave does all his duty faithfully, even then he is only an "unprofitable slave," unworthy of the thanks of his master. There was slavery of the worst kind in the world of Jesus, and yet he never opened his mouth to denounce the awful curse. It is claimed that Jesus' doctrine of love was indirectly a condemnation of slavery. Even then, inasmuch as other and earlier teachers did more than strike only indirectly at the ancient evil, — for they not only taught the brotherhood of man, too, but expressed themselves, besides, positively on the subject of slavery, — they have a prior claim to the "right of preeminence in the world's history, if they cared anything about ranks and titles.

 

The doctrine of humanity to animals, our dumb neighbors, is a positive tenet in Buddhism; is it in Christianity?

Two and a half centuries before Jesus, under the influence of Buddha's teaching, King Asoka convened a religious Parliament, offering to each and every representative of other religions, absolute religious liberty. Is there any trace of such tolerance in any of the sayings of Jesus? On the contrary, the claim of Jesus that he is the light, the way, the truth, and that no man can come to the father except through him, leaves no room for the great est of all boons-liberty, without which every promise of religion is only a mockery and a cheat. Not even heaven and eternal life can be accepted as a consideration for the loss of liberty. The liberty of teaching is alien to a teacher who claims, as Jesus did, that he alone is infallible, and that all who came before him were "thieves and robbers."

Of course, Mr. Jones will deny that Jesus ever said any of the things ascribed to him which spoil his ideal picture of him. But he finds his ideal Jesus, whose personality "defies analysis, baffles definition and overflows all words," in the gospels; if these are not reliable, what becomes of his argument? If the writers of our gospels bear false witness against Jesus when they represent him as "cursing the fig tree," as calling his enemies liars and devils, as calling the Gentiles dogs, as claiming equality with God, as menacing with damnation all who disagree with him, — what security have we that they speak truthfully when they put the beatitudes in his mouth? We have no more reliable authority for attributing to Jesus the beatitudes than we have for holding him responsible for the curses attributed to him in the gospels.

This reminds us of the story of Khaddar-Van (खांडव वन) in the Mahaa-Bhaarat. King Takshak was a sworn enemy of the Pandav. And Takshak was an ally of Indra, the lord protector of Heaven. Indra  provided protection to Takshak and the Pandav were helpless. When it was time, Krishna decided to attack Takshak with Arjun. But before attacking Takshak, Krishna warned Indra in words that have become immortal:

Takshkaaya Swahah; Indraaya Swahah (तक्षकायस्वाहाःइंद्राय  स्वाहाः)
we are going to burn Takshak; we can burn Indra as well. 
Indra had no desire to get into a conflict with Krishna-Arjun. So Indra withdrew his support of Takshak. Then Krishna-Arjun destroyed the kingdom of Takshak. In its place, Krishna helped the Pandav build their capital.

This is only one illustration of how understanding Krishna's tactics could help today's India. But to do so, India needs to understand and accept Krishna as the brilliant Vaasu-Dev and not bemoan Krishna's guile as Gurcharan Das does.

Among the thirty-five  sakha lords of Chandravati, at the foot of the Aravalli. The Rao of Bijolia,  one of the sixteen superior nobles of the Rana's court, is a Pramara of the ancient stock of Dhar.

 

 

 

Thirty-Five  Sakha of the Pramaras

 Of the Sodha tribe, a grand division of the Pramaras, and who held all the desert regions in remote times.

Their subdivisions, in which was the insular Bakhar, on the Indus : so we have the Sogdoi of  Alexander.

Chahuman or Chauhan.—  Agnikulas, but of the whole Rajput race immortalised in the song of the bard.

The four-handed warrior' All failed when sent against the demons, but the Chauhan, the last creation of the Brahmans to fight their battles against infidelity.

The birth of the Chauhan, to guard the rites of our Indian rights on this Olympus, the sacred Abu :

" The Guru of mountains, Sumer or Kailas, which Achaleswara made his abode. Fast but one day on –  your sins will be forgiven ; reside there for a year, – become the preceptor of mankind."

The Agnikunda Fire-pit.— little temptation to disturb the anchorites of Bal, " the Munis, , desire never approached, who drew support from the cow, from roots, fruits, and flowers,"   . " The Brahmans dug' the pit for burnt-sacrifice .

The genealogical tree of the Chauhans exhibits thirty-nine princes, the first created Chauhan, to Prithwiraja, the last of the Hindu emperors of India.

But whether the chain is entire we cannot say. The inference is decidedly against its being so ; for this creation or regeneration is assigned to an age centuries anterior to Vikramaditya : and we may safely state these converts to be of the Takshak race, invaders of India ut a very early period.

Ajaipal is a name celebrated in the Chauhan chronicles, as the founder of the fortress of Ajmer, one of the earliest establishments of Chauhan power.

Sambhar, on the banks of the extensive salt lake  Mahmud of Ghazni encountered Ajmer.

The second attack was at the end of the fourth century. A third was (luring the reign of Bisaladeva, who headed a grand conflict-)

Though we cannot trace the history of this branch of the Agnikulas to such periods of antiquity as the Pramara or Chauhan, it is from the deficiency of materials, rather  than any want of celebrity, that we are unable to place it, in this  respect, on a level with them.

The tradition of the bard makes the Solankis important as princes of Sura on the Ganges, the Rathors obtained Kanauj.

The genealogical test  claims Lohkot,  ancient Lahore, same Sakha (Madhwani) as the Chauhans.

Certain it is, that in the eighth century we find the Langahas ' and Togras inhabiting Multan and the  Bhattis on their desert.

princes of Kalyan, on the Malabar coast, it  was from Kalyan that a scion of the Solanki tree was taken, and engrafted on the royal stem of the Chawaras of Anhilwara Patan.

Bhojraj, the last of the Chawaras, and the Salic law of India make way for the young Solanki, Mulraj. During the reign of his son and successor,  Chamimd Rae, Mahmud of Ghazni the products of both the eastern and western hemispheres.

Siddharaja Jayasingha, the seventh  and richest,  kingdom of India.  Two-and-twenty principalities at one time owned his power, from  the Carnatic to the base of the Himalaya Mountains ; genealogical tree of the Solankis ;  Kumarapala, installed on the throne of Anhilwara, ' the tribe patron of Buddhism ; a new dynasty, called the Vaghela (descendants of Siddharaja) under BIsaldeo, succeeded  Somnath,  rose from its ruins, and the kingdom visited by EI Edrisi, called the Nubian geographer, who particularly describes the tenets of Buddha.

[He was probably not a Jain {BG, i. Part i. 179).]

* [The Gujarat account of the campaign is different (BG, i. Part i. 184 f.).]

* [Kumarapala made many benefactions to the Jains {Ibid. i. Part i.

190 f.).]

  • Ajayapala succeeded Kumarapala.
  • BhimaIl  last of the Ghaulukya dynasty, when, under the fourth prince, Karandeva, the angel of destruction appeared in the shape of Alau-d-din, and the kingdom annihilated.
  • The lieutenants of the Tatar despot of Delhi on the rich cities and fertile plains of Gujarat and Saurashtra.
  • The altar of an Islamite Darvesh with the shrine of Adinath, on the sacred mounts : the statues of Buddha [the Jain Tirthankaras] thrown down, and the books containing the mysteries of their faith back to  Alexandrian library.
  • The walls of Anhilwara were demolished; its foundations excavated, and filled up with the fragments of their ancient temples.
  • The Solanki dynasty were scattered by a singular dispensation of Providence, renovated, and its foundations rebuilt, by an the same  race Agnikulas converts, though Saharan the Tak Zafar Khan, and as Muzaffar ascended the throne of Gujarat, which he left to his son.
  • This son was Ahmad, who founded Ahmadabad, whose most splendid edifices were built from the ancient cities around it.
  • Baghels.—Though the stem of the Solankis was uprooted,  its branches (Sakha),  had fixed themselves in other soils.
  • The Baghela  family, which gave its Agnikulas, Pariharas
  • Tuars of Delhi or the Chauhans of Aimer
  • Mandor ^ (classically Maddodara) capital of the Parihars, prior to the invasion and settlement of the Rathors.
  • Five miles northward of the modern Jodhpur, the ancient Pali character, fragments of sculpture and Jain temples.
  • The Rathor with the Parihars  and Chonda, pitched the flag of the Rathors on the battlements of Mandor  assumed the title of Rana.
  • The Parihara scattered over Kuhari, the Sind, and the Chambal, colony of this race, twenty-four villages  along the Chambal incorporated with rule of the  most notorious body of thieves
  • Thug history.
  • The Parihars had twelve subdivisions, chief were the Indha and Sindhal : at the banks of the Luni.
  • Chawara or Chaura.—this tribe of the bard. Its origin to be of Scythic origin.
  • The peninsula of Saurashtra  intermarrying with the Suryavansa ancestry of Mewar, when this family were the lords of Valabhi.
  • The coast of Saurashtra, temple of Sonmath, dedicated to Balnath, or the sun,
  • worshippers of the sun ;
  • By a natural catastrophe, the prince of Deo, by the irruptions of the Arabians,
  • Abandoned on the continent and peninsula of Saurashtra.
  • At all events, the prince of Deo in lieu of Valabhipura, gave the title of Balakaraes to its princes, the Balhara .
  • Vana Raja founder as related the Solanki tribe, Bhojraj, deposed by his nephew
  • visited this court, of the Chawara race, , in the defence of Chitor against the first attack on record of the Muhammadans

.

  1. When Mahmud of Ghazni invaded Saurashtra and placed upon the throne, a prince of the former dynasty, a celebrated tribe, branch of the Chawara, and compound of Dabhi Chawara, the ancient Yadus.
  2. Anhala or Agnipala of the Chauhan line; said to have been founded by Raja Aja, a.d. 145.
  3. Ajayadeva Chauhan name derived from the goddess Sakambhari, the tutelar divinity of the tribes of the lake.
  4. * Dharma Dhiraj, father of Bisaladeva, must have been the defender on
  5. This occasion.
  6. [Muhammad bin Kasim seems to have marched along the Indus valley,
  7. not in the direction of Ajmer (Malik Muhammad Din, Bcihawalpur Gazetteer,

i. 28).]

  • The grand division of Asia, Tokharistan or Turkistan: and there is every appearance of that singular race, tlie Tajik, still scattered over these regions, and whose history appears a mystery, being the descendants of the Takshak.
  • It has been already observed, that ancient inscriptions in t) ie Pali or Buddhist character have been discovered in various parts of Rajasthan, of the race called Tasta, Takshak, and Tak, relating to the tribes, the Mori [or Maurya], Pramara, their descendants.
  • Naga and Takshak are the snake,  celebrated Nagvansa of the early heroic history of Mahabharata the Pandavas of Indraprastha.
  • Takshak  Janamejaya  invaded India,  the mountain (pahar) Tak, in the early history they dispossessed on the Indus, and established themselves in their land, called Salivahanpura ;
  • And as the date of this event is given as 3008 of the Yudhishthira era, it is by no means a Takshak, the conqueror of the Tuar Vikrama, was of the very family dispossessed by the Bhattis, who compelled them to migrate.
  • The calculated period of the invasion of the Takshaks, or. Nagvansa, under Sheshnag, is about six or seven centuries before the Christian era,
  • The Scythic invasion of Egypt and Syria, "by title prophet Ezekiel and Diodorus. The Abu Mahatma calls the Takshaks " the sons of Himachal," all  Scythic descent ; and it was only eight reigns anterior to this change in the Lunar dynasties .
  • The twenty-third Buddha [Jain Tirthankara], introduced his tenets into India, and fixed his abode in the holy mount Sarnet.
  • Great Khans of Kharizm (Chorasmia) the faith of Muhammad. The father of Tashkent, Turkistan,
  • The Mahabharata describes the snakes literally: seized and made a burnt-oft'ering (hom) of twenty thousand.
  • In Bihar, the successor of Ripunjaya. Parsva's symbol is the serpent of Takshak. His doctrines the princes of Valabhipura of Ma'ndor and Anhilwara all held to the tenets of Buddha.
  • [As usual, Jains are confounded with Buddhists,  the Nagas, a Serpent-wor.shipping tribe. modern times, dynasty of fourteen kings with the proud title of Muzaffar.
  • Muhammad, son of the first Tughlak, nephew Firoz Tak ; with the change of name and religion.
  • The traditions of the Jats of the Indus of Yadu extraction ; Yadus,
  • Migration from Zabulistan, and almost inducing with the descent of this tribe from Krishna.
  • Distinctions:  the Rajput States.— the same Mythology, the same theology, the same festivals
  • When the tie of a turban and the fold of a robe are, like Masonic symbols, distinguishing badges of tribes are best seen; where restraint is thrown aside, and no controls of character, his virtues and vices with the Rajput
  • Mind places him above restraint, and love of character, free communication, opinions and his prejudices, and devoid of opinion of self,
  • Which imagines that learned from such friendly intercourse personal arises from locale; the mental similarity from a grand fixed principle, its intrinsic moral effect, incompatibility with the elevated notions to these races, as their ancient habits
  • Boasted peculiarly favored destiny to prevent us from prostrate, in our periodical Ambitious visitations
  • These most ancient relics of civilization on the face of the earth. For the dread of our empire such a result would be opposed  to our own stability.
  • Alliance.—with our system of alliances, pregnant with evil, origin
  • From desired by the wit of a series of treaties with an ultimate rupture.
  • These would be entitled to specimens of the spirit and the letter of every treaty; while the internal groundwork, by successive stipulations, positive qualities
  • Continue where discipline is master of his own source of contention.
  • By leading to individual aid the tributary unsettled leaves a door open to a system of disgusting, but openings to laxity in contact with our system, present with greater evil.
  • The lost sight like ancient Rome, the barbarians ' … virtue and high notions
  • From contact in all the native legions, the book of knowledge and of truth, which
  • Teach them submission and weakness expect eternal gratitude,
  • For grand impulse.
  • A signal instance of the of power, mantle of protection, warlike races,
  • Philanthropic feelings, international animosity to drink the same fountain'
  • Led to expect the holy man reposed under his own fig-tree.
  • When period of great calamity and danger, foreigner, the control of forces
  • In time of peace, share the fruits …..What must be the result?
  • When each Rajput may hang up his lance and make a basket of
  • His buckler, the prostration of every virtue commences the martial virtues;
  • Cunning and meanness will follow.
  • Character the power of protection! To be great, independent, martial
  • If within the bounds of moderation.
  • Led away by enthusiasm,  experienced the danger ,  observing one side of the picture —
  • The brilliant lights shone on days of darkness, not calculating the shade would follow the sudden glare.
  • The Largest Conspiracy of All Time -Jesus Christ was Caesarian, the son of Julius Caesar and Cleopatra
  • Jesus Christ
  • Was Caesarian, the son of Julius Caesar and Cleopatra? In 46 BC Julius Caesar changed the calendar from the 13 month system to his new adapted 12 month version, using his family names as some of the months, Augustus (august) and Julius or Julie (July).
  • The curious thing about this is if you look closely everything pertaining to ancient Egypt is BC while everything pertaining to the Holy Roman Empire is AD. That is because the 12/13 royal bloodlines who have ruled over mankind for thousands of years have established their empires using religion and covering up history to maintain power of their empires during times of uncertainty. Therefore 45 BC are the same as 1 AD and if you look up anything that happened between 21 BC and 1 AD you will find very little information of any events. That is because during this time the Roman Empire was fully established and that is the reason for this discrepancy.
  • I say there are 12/13 bloodlines and the 13 is the most powerful bloodline and remains the most hidden. That is because Julius Caesar was stabbed to death by members of his own council. After this Cleopatra had her son Caesarian exiled to conceal his identity as the rightful successor to the crown and to insure hiw own safety.
  • Caesarian was then put under the care of his adopted parent Mary and Joseph. He travelled to India and studied Vedic texts under Brahman priests.

EGYPT

Returning to Alexandria Egypt later betraying his teachers and recaptured the once Egyptian Empire, now Holy Roman Empire by the name Jesus Christ. Jesus which is the name of Esau in Egyptian means, son of Isis and this is also recorded in ancient hieroglyphs.

Cleopatra was the self proclaimed virgin Goddess Isis named after Isis ( Indian Goddess Rajeshwari) which came before her in family succession to the crown. 

Upon Jesus return he found his half sister and two other brothers. Selene was his half sister and after they were wed she had changed her name to Mary Magdalene. Or at least that is what was recorded. The truth of the matter is that none of these biblical figures other than Mary and Joseph were ever accounted for historically because they were known by different names historically.

Caesarian was Ptolemy the last reigning pharaoh of Egypt and the founder of the HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE and the greatest lie ever told. He was also referred to as "King of Kings" and "Lord of Lords" much like his father Julius Caesar who was once worshipped as a God and established the dictatorship of Caesarian ruler ship

if you really want to know the truth about God, look no further than the Mandelbrot Set. This is a holographic image of the entire universe. The interesting thing about the Mandelbrot set is that you can zoom into the image and eventually you will find yourself looking at the same image you started with. This is the fabric of God meaning that we are all one. That leaves no room for Jesus the self proclaimed one and only messiah or son of God.

The 13 hidden bloodline

It includes the Queen Elizabeth and the house of Windsor, bloodline of George Bush. The remaining 12 bloodlines are known as the twelve lost tribes of Israel who have established governments today across the globe.

Rendering the Bible which was mostly taken from Ancient Egypt and then adapted by Julius Caesar nothing more than a fabricated half truth edited into Julius Caesars  2000 year, three world war plan to establish a one world Government. Take a look at the book of Revelations again. They are not concerned with any ones safety but their own. Nobody gets saved but their own.

According to the Georgia Guide Stones they have planned to reduce the population dramatically. Right now it is approaching 7 Billion. What they want to maintain is a population under 500,000,000. Which means the only people to survive according to this plan for war are the 12 tribes or the 144,000. Which means by the year 2012 they plan on wiping over 6.5 billion people from the face of the earth, leaving only members and certain handpicked  people as they can not only inbreed, they have to sometimes let outsiders in to maintain their bloodline.

They will use things like earthquakes often controlled by secret government organizations like HAARP and Codex Alementarius which goes in affect globally on December 31, 2009. Codex Alementarius is a global mandate similar to how the FDA regulates food here in the US. Only codex Alementarius insures that deadly toxins and chemicals will be in our food supply come the year 2010. You may also want to check into Monsanto and his pesticide products which are killing people all around the globe today.

When they introduce this new messiah figure you will call him the antichrist, but you will die waiting for Christ when the slaughter begins. Because Christ is dead and will not return. They do not want you to worship the messiah of the old age Pisces our current age, come the Age of Aquarius because it interferes with their agenda. So instead they plan to heard you like cattle into one of over 800 FEMA death camps already in existence today in the US. What they do want according to the Georgia guide stones is for the next age to be an age of reason, having a world court, one world religion and government.

Jesus was the son of Cleopatra's son. Impossibly, he just disappears from history more like abdicating the throne. As we know the Egyptian lineages go through the female first, then any of Cleo's kids would carry the royal lineage.

Cleopatra was GREEK (mostly) as she was one of the Ptolemies, one of Alexander's generals (Greek), who was given the rule of Egypt at Alexander's death, and established the GREEK period of Egyptian history in the Ptolemaic dynasty. She was Mediterranean descent and she was WHITE.  Cleopatra was born in 69 BC in Alexandria, Egypt. She lived 39 years and died as the last queen and Pharoh of Egypt. Cleopatra was a descendent of a Greek dynasty that ruled Egypt after Alexander the Great's death. In 51 BC, Cleopatra's father died and left the kingdom to Cleopatra and her brother. They were quickly married for the sake of the crown

"The secret rulers of the world", julias caesarian son of julias Caesar and Cleopatra was the true Jesus Christ "Nostradamus " prefix to nostradmuses son "c'esar", which is very close to the name caesarian, and i remove the "c" you get esar which we all know as another name for Jesus Christ, bear in mind also the initials "jack", u may also b aware that julias Caesar was proclaimed as god "divus", and Cleopatra claimed she was Isis the virgin goddess, julias caesarian ….letter which is written to king Henry ll of france where he gives some more hints to the true id of jc, ie, he writes,

For God will take notice of the long barrenness of the great dame, who there upon will conceive two principal children. But she will be in danger, and the female to whom she will have given birth will also, because of the temerity of the age, be in danger of death in her eighteenth year, and will be unable to live beyond her thirty-sixth year.

She will leave three males, and one female, and of these two will not have had the same father. There will be great differences between the three brothers, and then there will be such great cooperation and agreement between them that the three and four parts of Europe will tremble.

The youngest of them will sus- tain and augment the Christian monarchy, and under him sects will be elevated, and suddenly cast down, Arabs will be driven back, kingdoms united and new laws promulgated.

 

you can also see that nostra-d writes that the great dame will be in danger from the age of 18, Cleopatra was named queen of Egypt at the age of 18 and died at the age of 36 after the battle of actium by a self imposed snake bite, all this happened about 30 years before the said birth of Jesus Christ,  also nostra-d in some of his quatrains mentions the reds and the whites ………………………… research Egyptian history to learn about these colors

 

 Julia's cassation was proclaimed son of Caesar by Caesar himself which really cheesed off his stepson Octavian because Octavian was being trained and groomed as the successor to the throne of Italy

but how can a stepson of Caesar become king when julias Caesar and Cleopatra have a true heir to the thrown of egypt and Italy, in effect uniting the east and west, the official storey says that julias caesarian was betrayed and murdered by his own bodyguards, but the unofficial version states that he escaped at the age of 14 to India where he learnt the way of the Buddha before returning to Alexandria and then finally to Jerusalem where he was crucified supposedly……………

bear in mind that Jesus is a white man in the middle east which if you think about it doesn't make sense unless his parents were white Caesar was white obviously and Cleopatra was Greek so she must been white as well, you must all be aware of the 3 kings storey in the bible ie 3 kings follow the eastern star to find the miracle birth of the messiah

The 3 kings are actually the belt of Orion"

 check Wikipedia : the brightest star in the sky Sirius, Sirius in Egyptian times was known as Isis and basically the 3 kings of Orion and and the star Sirius in Egyptian times pointed to where the sun would rise on Christmas day ie the birth of god sun,  also the sun end  time basically on the 22,  23,  24th of December in Egyptian times the sun rose no higher in the sky for 3 days ie died for 3 days and was resurrected on Christmas day  which to the Egyptians was the start of the new year basically the summer was on its way and the river Nile flooded bringing life to Egypt and performing miracles this planetary alignment now occurs around the 11th of January  that the Christian religion is a carbon copy of the Egyptian religion from thousands of years before the official birth of "jc" research the sun god horus of Egypt this bit is hard to write so u must watch this video even if you don't agree with me, the video is called zeitgeist which is on YouTube for you to view and i think it will surprise you a lot, it did me, anyway i have more but its late and i need to sleep lol, look forward to ur replies cya.

References :

  1.  Nostradamus
  2.  Poor Mans Hieroglyphs
  3.  (the secret rulers of the world) on YouTube episode 9,10,11,12
  4.  Zeitgeist, on YouTube a must see for anyone who wants to be educated on the truth.
  5.  And a fun ill programme called hibernate 3 which can teach you the basics of writing hieroglyphics.
  6.  Anals and Antiquities Rajasthan
  7. Maps / Catalogues, Report etc deposited in the Map Room Great Britain
  8. Profiles of Alexander Great
  9. Profiles of Hercules in India ( HARI KULA)
  10. Greek Gods & Goddess
  11. The Lineage of the Families as I have taken you here.
  12. Buddhism

 

 http://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/jesus-was-caesar-new-book-by-philosopher-and-linguist-francesco-carotta-claims-that-the-real-identity-of-jesus-christ-has-been-discovered-154575075.html

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)